Follow Wally on Twitter!
Followers
Powered by Blogger.
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
An open letter to Patrick Swayze: The Manchester City Preview
I used to like Roberto Mancini. Maybe it was due to the fact he actually was a very good player back in the day. Maybe it was because of his gorgeous hair, which looked even more unflappably better when I saw him in the flesh at a Fulham game. Maybe it was because he finally bested Fergie at mind-games where the Scot and Man U are meant to excel. It was also, I'm sure, because Man City beat the obnoxious Utd after their neighbours basically threw the title away, something which they normally claim to never happen to them despite evidence to the contrary.
Man that was sweet. |
Basically Roberto: I liked you because you beat Man U and Fergie at their own game, and with the cruellest of wins. It was sweet. Even your celebration with Brian Kidd was better than Fergie's own celebration with the same man (harsh to call him a mercenary?). I mean, you jumped into his arms and locked your legs around his waist. It was like seeing a live re-enactment of Dirty Dancing and you were Patrick Swayze. It was gorgeous.
'Nobody puts Mancini in the corner' |
I liked you so much at that point that I had even overlooked your annoying habits. I had been willing to forgive you for not standing your ground with Tevez after taking the moral high ground. I had forgiven you for constantly putting on that air of constant unhappiness despite being in what is surely the easiest job in world football. I had forgiven you for bringing Mario Balotelli to the UK. Actually, that's a lie, I actually loved you for it. So, like an old couple, we actually had a good run. I was even willing to acknowledge you winning the title as an 'achievement' despite your club spending more money in two seasons than anyone else in the world.
And then it all changed. I saw your press conferences before the season. You should have been refreshed after some 'well-earned' holidays. After all, you had the best team in the land. You had riches other clubs or leagues would dream of. You had authority in the dressing-room. People were respecting you more now. And then you started to whine. You started to complain about having to sell before buying. You started to complain about not having enough players, of having too many players.
And that's when it hit me. You had won the Premier League. You were no longer the also-rans. I was not willing to overlook the fact you bought your way to the title (like every other Premier League winners). Your team became just like Chelsea when they started winning. You had become unlikeable. You had become a winner, and goodness me you were annoying.
So there we are Man City: you've won, and I'm happy for you. But you better start enjoying being hated. That's the price of success.
THE TRANSFER REVIEW
Man City's ins and outs is like reading a 'Who's Who' of failures. Out of the club are Adebayor, Bridge (he still plays football!), Owen Hargreaves, Adam Johnson, Stuart Taylor, Vladimir Weiss, Nigel de Jong, Stefan Savic, Dedryck Boyata and Roque Santa Cruz. Only De Jong can be considered a success at Man City. A few of these players could have gone on to become very valuable players at the club if patience was a virtue at the Etihad. Yes I'm thinking of you Adam Johnson. No, not you Stefan Savic. The rest are a mixed bunch of flops and overpaid average players. So let's consider who's come in.
JACK RODWELL
Let's consider the ipad. Let's be honest: who needs an ipad? They're expensive, and all they do is basically combine an ipod with a laptop. But it looks nice and snazzy. So people buy it. People who have laptops and ipods buy ipads. They also buy iphones, but that's another issue. You don't need an ipad when you have all those things, but it's some sort of statement to have one. And this is where Steve Jobs was a genius (a commercial, money-grabbing, black turtle-neck-wearing-jumper-scumbag-genius). And this is where we're all suckers. because we buy ipads and iphones when we don't need them.
Jack Rodwell is Man City's ipad. Overrated and not needed at that club (you had de Jong for goodness sake!). But it's a statement to buy a player who is supposedly the Rio Ferdinand of the future despite never playing centre-back. It's a statement to buy a player you're not going to play much, just to say you can. I sort of understand it somehow, especially when you consider ipads and the fact we're talking about football. After all, why did Man Utd buy Phil Jones when they had Chris Smalling heading there? Clubs do it all the time.
However, if you're Rodwell, seeing Adam Johnson head out as you're signing your contract should be a warning sign. You might have a burgeoning reputation but that doesn't mean you're going to play. You think Adam Johnson thought in 2010 that he'd be playing for Sunderland in 2012? Where is Rodwell going to be in 2014?
Best case scenario: A cross between Gareth Barry and Yaya Touré
Worst case scenario: Stefan Savic and de Jong's lovechild.
JAVI GARCIA
It was actually pretty reassuring to see Javi Garcia come to Man City for a disproportionate amount of money (£16m!). It meant that Man City didn't get Javi Martinez of Bilbao. It also meant that they weren't willing to stump up the cash as they used to. Maybe the Financial Fair Play rules are causing concern. And that's good.
Anyway, back to Javi Garcia. What Man City got is a solid holding midfielder, which sounds ridiculous considering they let go of de Jong and bought Rodwell already. But Javi Garcia has pedigree which Rodwell doesn't have: a solid few years learning the ropes and eventually playing over 20 games for Real Madrid, Champions' League experience with Benfica and even a cap with Spain. I've got to say that's pretty solid.
But will Javi Garcia play? He's facing enormous competitiveness at his position and has never played in the Prem. It's going to be interesting.
Best case scenario: the lovechild of Gareth Barry and de Jong
Worst case scenario: David Pizarro
MAICON
It's always good to buy a marauding right-back with no defensive skills, especially when you already have one at the club (hello Micah Richards!). Let's make it clear: Maicon was a beast. Now he's just porky. And he still can't defend. I'm sure Roberto will enjoy working with him whilst Maicon and David Platt will finish off the pies. That's not because David Platt is fat, it's because he speaks Italian and it's a nice way of bonding with Maicon whilst introducing him to local cuisine.
Anyway, it's baffling for ManCity to have actually acquired Maicon. After all, he is 32 now, coming on big wages and has never played in the Prem. And where is the sense in all this considering Man City already have Richards and Zabaleta (very underrated, solid defensively and good going forward)? Unless Roberto plans on playing Micah at centre-back. And that would be even more baffling.
Best case scenario: a more explosive Zabaleta
Worst case scenario: Man City's Winston Bogarde
SCOTT SINCLAIR
Sometimes players are ungrateful. Actually, instead of 'sometimes', I should have written 'often'. And if there's one ungrateful player out there, it's Scott Sinclair. Let's rewind back to 2010. After about 74 loan spells at lower league clubs (yes I include Wigan as a lower league club. Not much better than Blackpool), nobody wanted Scott Sinclair. The guy was 21 but was washed up; he'd never proven anything to anyone at a decent level. Rejected by everyone, he found his way to Swansea, an up and coming club willing to take a chance on him. It was a match made in heaven; Sinclair found a role which suited him in a team which played a style of football any footballer would like to play. An impressive debut season in the Prem followed with 8 goals and several convincing performances. Scott Sinclair had managed to claw his way back. And then he forgot who he owed for his rise, refusing to sign a new contract with the only club which put faith in him. He preferred going to Man City instead, not heeding the numerous warning signs over the years for English wingers going there. A sad tale and I for one will not cheer Scott Sinclair on the rare occasions he gets to play.
Best case scenario: Adam Johnson
Worst case scenario: Shaun Wright-Phillips (second time round)
MATIJA NASTASIC
Wow. That one came out of nowhere. My reaction was 'Oh I won't get to see Stefan Savic again', followed by 'Who the hell is Matija Nastasic?', followed by '£12m!'. This sums up pretty much all I've got to say about this transfer. 26 games in Serie A for one of the worst Fiorentina teams of the last few years, and the guy is worth £10 (£12m + Stefan Savic)! Looks like Italian owners are tough negotiators. Nastasic for £12m and Borini for £11m. Talk about maximizing average talent.
So what do we know about Matija Nastasic? He's Serbian, so he's got to be tough. He's still only 19, so he's got age on his side. And he's not Stefan Savic.
Is it too much to ask for a Savic for £12m and Nastasic transfer in a year's time?
Best case scenario: Nemanja Vidic
Worst case scenario: Stefan Savic
RICHARD WRIGHT
Oh wow. Richard Wright is still a professional football player? I thought he was shooting some sort of pseudo-fictional s**t TV series in Essex. What is there to say about Richard Wright. He's been to goalkeepers what Francis Jeffers has been to strikers: an absolute unconditional flop. That's a nice way of saying he's incredibly crap. By the by, Jeffers is currently training with Tranmere after being released by Motherwell and Newcastle Jets (of Australia) in consecutive seasons. The only difference? A good agent for Richard.
It does bother me that the 3rd keeper spot is not given to someone from the youth team. After all, Man City have about 63 players under; I'm sure one of them is a slightly promising young goalkeeper. even if he's not remotely promising he'll still be better than Richard Wright.
Best case scenario: Stuart Taylor
Worst case scenario: Richard Wright
WALLY'S ADVICE
Keep your players happy
That is so freakingly obvious I feel bad even typing it up. With so many players and so many egos at his disposal, Roberto is going to have a lot of work on his hands. That should never mean, however, that Kolo Touré gets to start ahead of Lescott or Kompany.
Don't start with the 3-5-2
OK, it's worked out well for you in a few games. But you won the league playing 4-2-3-1, so keep that formation as it works wonders.
Who's going to play on the wings?
Nasri isn't a winger, Adam Johnson is gone and Milner is Milner. So, apart from Scott Sinclair, who's going to play on the wings? Or does that mean we're heading towards a system with no wingers?
THE LINE-UP
In our view
Hart
Zabaleta Kompany Lescott Clichy
Touré Yaya Javi Garcia/Barry/Rodwell
Silva Aguero Nasri
Tevez/Dzeko
How they probably will line up
Hart
Zabaleta Kompany Lescott Kolarov/Clichy
Touré Yaya Barry
Silva Aguero Nasri
Tevez
PREDICTIONS
Man City are still the best team with the best squad. For that reason alone they should finish 1st and it probably shouldn't even be a contest. It will be tight, they will be pushed, but they should win.
This might be a Sunderland banner but it could read 'This is what Man City does to you'. Adam Johnson: what Rodwell should have considered. |
Best case scenario: A cross between Gareth Barry and Yaya Touré
Worst case scenario: Stefan Savic and de Jong's lovechild.
JAVI GARCIA
It was actually pretty reassuring to see Javi Garcia come to Man City for a disproportionate amount of money (£16m!). It meant that Man City didn't get Javi Martinez of Bilbao. It also meant that they weren't willing to stump up the cash as they used to. Maybe the Financial Fair Play rules are causing concern. And that's good.
Anyway, back to Javi Garcia. What Man City got is a solid holding midfielder, which sounds ridiculous considering they let go of de Jong and bought Rodwell already. But Javi Garcia has pedigree which Rodwell doesn't have: a solid few years learning the ropes and eventually playing over 20 games for Real Madrid, Champions' League experience with Benfica and even a cap with Spain. I've got to say that's pretty solid.
But will Javi Garcia play? He's facing enormous competitiveness at his position and has never played in the Prem. It's going to be interesting.
An uncertain role to play |
Best case scenario: the lovechild of Gareth Barry and de Jong
Worst case scenario: David Pizarro
MAICON
It's always good to buy a marauding right-back with no defensive skills, especially when you already have one at the club (hello Micah Richards!). Let's make it clear: Maicon was a beast. Now he's just porky. And he still can't defend. I'm sure Roberto will enjoy working with him whilst Maicon and David Platt will finish off the pies. That's not because David Platt is fat, it's because he speaks Italian and it's a nice way of bonding with Maicon whilst introducing him to local cuisine.
Anyway, it's baffling for ManCity to have actually acquired Maicon. After all, he is 32 now, coming on big wages and has never played in the Prem. And where is the sense in all this considering Man City already have Richards and Zabaleta (very underrated, solid defensively and good going forward)? Unless Roberto plans on playing Micah at centre-back. And that would be even more baffling.
'Please God, help me find a club where I don't have to play and can earn crazy amount of money' |
Worst case scenario: Man City's Winston Bogarde
SCOTT SINCLAIR
Sometimes players are ungrateful. Actually, instead of 'sometimes', I should have written 'often'. And if there's one ungrateful player out there, it's Scott Sinclair. Let's rewind back to 2010. After about 74 loan spells at lower league clubs (yes I include Wigan as a lower league club. Not much better than Blackpool), nobody wanted Scott Sinclair. The guy was 21 but was washed up; he'd never proven anything to anyone at a decent level. Rejected by everyone, he found his way to Swansea, an up and coming club willing to take a chance on him. It was a match made in heaven; Sinclair found a role which suited him in a team which played a style of football any footballer would like to play. An impressive debut season in the Prem followed with 8 goals and several convincing performances. Scott Sinclair had managed to claw his way back. And then he forgot who he owed for his rise, refusing to sign a new contract with the only club which put faith in him. He preferred going to Man City instead, not heeding the numerous warning signs over the years for English wingers going there. A sad tale and I for one will not cheer Scott Sinclair on the rare occasions he gets to play.
I couldn't put a picture of Adam Johnson twice, so here's Shaun Wright-Phillips to hammer home my point. |
Worst case scenario: Shaun Wright-Phillips (second time round)
MATIJA NASTASIC
Wow. That one came out of nowhere. My reaction was 'Oh I won't get to see Stefan Savic again', followed by 'Who the hell is Matija Nastasic?', followed by '£12m!'. This sums up pretty much all I've got to say about this transfer. 26 games in Serie A for one of the worst Fiorentina teams of the last few years, and the guy is worth £10 (£12m + Stefan Savic)! Looks like Italian owners are tough negotiators. Nastasic for £12m and Borini for £11m. Talk about maximizing average talent.
So what do we know about Matija Nastasic? He's Serbian, so he's got to be tough. He's still only 19, so he's got age on his side. And he's not Stefan Savic.
Is it too much to ask for a Savic for £12m and Nastasic transfer in a year's time?
He's gone and I'm sad. |
Best case scenario: Nemanja Vidic
Worst case scenario: Stefan Savic
RICHARD WRIGHT
Oh wow. Richard Wright is still a professional football player? I thought he was shooting some sort of pseudo-fictional s**t TV series in Essex. What is there to say about Richard Wright. He's been to goalkeepers what Francis Jeffers has been to strikers: an absolute unconditional flop. That's a nice way of saying he's incredibly crap. By the by, Jeffers is currently training with Tranmere after being released by Motherwell and Newcastle Jets (of Australia) in consecutive seasons. The only difference? A good agent for Richard.
It does bother me that the 3rd keeper spot is not given to someone from the youth team. After all, Man City have about 63 players under; I'm sure one of them is a slightly promising young goalkeeper. even if he's not remotely promising he'll still be better than Richard Wright.
Richard Wright trying to save a penalty for England. Yes, this actually happened. |
Best case scenario: Stuart Taylor
Worst case scenario: Richard Wright
WALLY'S ADVICE
Keep your players happy
That is so freakingly obvious I feel bad even typing it up. With so many players and so many egos at his disposal, Roberto is going to have a lot of work on his hands. That should never mean, however, that Kolo Touré gets to start ahead of Lescott or Kompany.
Don't start with the 3-5-2
OK, it's worked out well for you in a few games. But you won the league playing 4-2-3-1, so keep that formation as it works wonders.
Who's going to play on the wings?
Nasri isn't a winger, Adam Johnson is gone and Milner is Milner. So, apart from Scott Sinclair, who's going to play on the wings? Or does that mean we're heading towards a system with no wingers?
THE LINE-UP
In our view
Hart
Zabaleta Kompany Lescott Clichy
Touré Yaya Javi Garcia/Barry/Rodwell
Silva Aguero Nasri
Tevez/Dzeko
How they probably will line up
Hart
Zabaleta Kompany Lescott Kolarov/Clichy
Touré Yaya Barry
Silva Aguero Nasri
Tevez
PREDICTIONS
Man City are still the best team with the best squad. For that reason alone they should finish 1st and it probably shouldn't even be a contest. It will be tight, they will be pushed, but they should win.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment